← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Geraci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-04-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 47 7 8 15 0.319 0.1301 0.1348 0.2565 0.2658
2022-23 Blackfalds Bulldogs AJHL 54 3 14 17 0.315 0.1056 0.1023 0.2913 0.2821
2023-24 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 38 0 6 6 0.158 0.0580 0.0547 0.1667 0.1572
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New York University ACHA_D1 22 6 12 18 0.818
2024-25 New York University ACHA_D1 22 6 12 18 0.818
2024-25 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC 22 2 5 7 0.318
2023-24 New York University ACHA_D1 22 6 12 18 0.818
2022-23 New York University ACHA_D1 22 6 12 18 0.818
2021-22 New York University ACHA_D1 22 6 12 18 0.818
2020-21 New York University ACHA_D1 22 6 12 18 0.818

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16126
Defenseman overall
#2948
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2001-02
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2009-10
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.