← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory Schillo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Melville Millionaires SJHL 54 3 10 13 0.241 0.0617 0.0637 0.1784 0.1842
2017-18 Melville Millionaires SJHL 52 13 12 25 0.481 0.1232 0.1215 0.3563 0.3515
2018-19 Melville Millionaires SJHL 40 3 17 20 0.500 0.1281 0.1198 0.3705 0.3464
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen SO 7 2 0 2 0.286
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 7 2 0 2 0.286
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen FR 24 2 3 5 0.208
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 24 2 3 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2019-20 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+102.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39903
Forward overall
#2077
Forward born in 1998
#1048
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2013-14
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.