| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Hastings | USHS-MN | 26 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 0.846 | 0.1043 | 0.1043 | 0.2055 | 0.2055 |
| 2020-21 | Hastings | USHS-MN | 19 | 16 | 9 | 25 | 1.316 | 0.1621 | 0.1621 | 0.3196 | 0.3196 |
| 2021-22 | Chippewa Steel | NAHL | 44 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.091 | 0.0323 | 0.0336 | 0.0954 | 0.0992 |
| 2022-23 | WB/Scranton Knights | NCDC | 26 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.346 | 0.0800 | 0.0795 | 0.2799 | 0.2783 |
| 2023-24 | North Iowa Bulls | NA3HL | 40 | 26 | 21 | 47 | 1.175 | 0.1300 | 0.1209 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | — | 24 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.333 |
| 2024-25 | Lake Forest | D3 | NCHA | — | 10 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.300 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.