← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jax Schauer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Hastings USHS-MN 26 10 12 22 0.846 0.1043 0.1043 0.2055 0.2055
2020-21 Hastings USHS-MN 19 16 9 25 1.316 0.1621 0.1621 0.3196 0.3196
2021-22 Chippewa Steel NAHL 44 2 2 4 0.091 0.0323 0.0336 0.0954 0.0992
2022-23 WB/Scranton Knights NCDC 26 2 7 9 0.346 0.0800 0.0795 0.2799 0.2783
2023-24 North Iowa Bulls NA3HL 40 26 21 47 1.175 0.1300 0.1209
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Forest D3 NCHA 24 2 6 8 0.333
2024-25 Lake Forest D3 NCHA 10 2 1 3 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2024-25 · Lake Forest
+235.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29305
Forward overall
#1686
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2017-18
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2015-16
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.278 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.