← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zachary Nyman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-02-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Penticton Vees BCHL 38 0 13 13 0.342 0.1318 0.1470 0.4976 0.5550
2025-26 Brampton Steelheads OHL 34 3 9 12 0.353 0.2042 0.2118 0.9240 0.9586
2026-27 Brampton Steelheads OHL 7 0 2 2 0.286 0.1653 0.1653 0.7481 0.7481
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8879
Defenseman overall
#602
Defenseman born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2003-04
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2019-20
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2000-01
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.