IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marshall Braunscheidel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-24 Country: USA
Post
NE10 D2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 East Coast Wizards EHL 37 3 8 11 0.297 0.0687 0.0646 0.1455 0.1367
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#46051
Forward overall
#3057
Forward born in 2005
#2035
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Post Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Matt Pacheco
0.00
actual FR PPG at Post
Cameron Craig
0.27
actual FR PPG at Post
Bradley McMains
0.20
actual FR PPG at Post
Costa Pizanis
0.15
actual FR PPG at Post

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Montambault
Adrian · 2017-18
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alonzo Colburn
New England College · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Parry
Westfield State · 2023-24
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.