IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Landon Jackman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2009-06-23 Country: USA
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Owen Sound Attack OHL 38 3 6 9 0.237 0.1370 0.1514 0.6085 0.6726
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39225
Forward overall
#180
Forward born in 2009
#1283
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Joe Wegwerth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
J.J. Piccinich
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Boston University (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Chris Dodero
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ American International (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Shane Gersich
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Stevens
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Anthony Cipollone
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.14
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
Michael Salandra
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
Timothy Heinke
NE-Prep 2020-21
0.20
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
Wyatt Bongiovanni
USHL 2015-16
0.61
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Huff
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2006-07
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marlon Gardner
Neumann · 2003-04
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.