IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Timothy Heinke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 26 8 4 12 0.462 0.1302 0.1302 0.2112 0.2112
2019-20 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 27 5 8 13 0.481 0.1358 0.1358 0.2203 0.2203
2020-21 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 4 2 0 2 0.500 0.1411 0.1411 0.2288 0.2288
2021-22 South Shore Kings NCDC 45 34 15 49 1.089 0.6072 0.5832 0.8805 0.8457
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 AHA SR 38 5 11 16 0.421
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 AHA — 39 12 7 19 0.487
2023-24 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 6 0 1 1 0.167
2022-23 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 10 0 2 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2022-23 · Quinnipiac
-42.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11740
Forward overall
#515
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Kyle Novak
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Felan
Lawrence · 2014-15
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Bates
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyson Gilmour
SUNY Geneseo · 2018-19
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.