IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Timothy Heinke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 26 8 4 12 0.462 0.0928 0.0928 0.2110 0.2110
2019-20 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 27 5 8 13 0.481 0.0968 0.0968 0.2202 0.2202
2020-21 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 4 2 0 2 0.500 0.1006 0.1006 0.2286 0.2286
2021-22 South Shore Kings NCDC 45 34 15 49 1.089 0.4439 0.4263 0.8713 0.8368
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 AHA SR 38 5 11 16 0.421
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 AHA — 39 12 7 19 0.487
2023-24 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 6 0 1 1 0.167
2022-23 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 10 0 2 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2022-23 · Quinnipiac
-21.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10890
Forward overall
#501
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Valadao
Curry · 2013-14
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Troy York
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Mikulan
Aurora · 2011-12
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.