← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexander Karmanov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-03-22 Country: Moldova
2026 · Round 7, Pick #201  ·  San Jose Sharks San Jose Sharks
Penn State
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 North Bay Battalion OHL 20 0 2 2 0.100 0.0579 0.0604 0.2618 0.2730
2026-27 North Bay Battalion OHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.1157 0.1157 0.5237 0.5237
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24840
Defenseman overall
#1389
Defenseman born in 2008
#1712
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Penn State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2019-20
0.30
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2021-22
0.33
actual FR PPG at Penn State
USHL 2023-24
0.11
actual FR PPG at Penn State
BCHL 2016-17
0.00
actual FR PPG at Penn State

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2002-03
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2019-20
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2014-15
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.