IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kenny Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-05-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Penticton Vees BCHL 49 2 8 10 0.204 0.0786 0.0808 0.2968 0.3050
2017-18 Penticton Vees BCHL 52 1 9 10 0.192 0.0741 0.0726 0.2797 0.2740
2018-19 — BCHL 51 8 12 20 0.392 0.1511 0.1399 0.5704 0.5279
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Penn State D1 BigTen SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 31 1 4 5 0.161
2020-21 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 5 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16330
Defenseman overall
#2484
Defenseman born in 1998
#2670
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colin Phaneuf
St. Scholastica · 2010-11
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Kennedy
Babson · 2021-22
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Zizek
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.