IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hayden Martin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2009-02-27 Country: Canada
Bowling Green
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Collingwood Blues OJHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.2451 0.2830 0.6885 0.7948
2025-26 Collingwood Blues OJHL 31 3 16 19 0.613 0.1502 0.1652 1.2848 1.3999
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7900
Defenseman overall
#131
Defenseman born in 2009

D1 Comparables

Dan Willett
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ RIT (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Jacobs
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Linhart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Collins
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Louie Belpedio
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Miami (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Bowling Green Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Cameron Babiak
NTDP-U18 2015-16
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
Brian Lonergan
NAHL 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
T.J. Lloyd
AJHL 2016-17
0.29
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green
Adam Smith
OJHL 2013-14
0.14
actual FR PPG at Bowling Green

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Armour
Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joshua Burke
Amherst · 2018-19
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mickey Gilchrist
Middlebury · 2002-03
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.