← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Garvey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
Wesleyan
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Milton Academy NE-Prep 28 2 6 8 0.286 0.0575 0.0575 0.1307 0.1307
2024-25 Milton Academy NE-Prep 28 5 12 17 0.607 0.1221 0.1221 0.2776 0.2776
2025-26 Milton Academy NE-Prep 29 6 23 29 1.000 0.2011 0.2011 0.4573 0.4573
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
30%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6745
Defenseman overall
#302
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Wesleyan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.00
actual FR PPG at Wesleyan
0.33
actual FR PPG at Wesleyan
0.76
actual FR PPG at Wesleyan
0.40
actual FR PPG at Wesleyan

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2001-02
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Williams · 2012-13
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2021-22
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.