IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-07-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Moose Jaw Warriors WHL 24 2 1 3 0.125 0.0608 0.0674 0.3067 0.3399
2002-03 Moose Jaw Warriors WHL 49 8 6 14 0.286 0.1390 0.1470 0.7010 0.7414
2003-04 — WHL 57 9 11 20 0.351 0.1707 0.1723 0.8610 0.8688
2004-05 Red Deer Rebels WHL 55 10 19 29 0.527 0.2565 0.2451 1.2938 1.2363
2005-06 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 66 10 16 26 0.394 0.1916 0.1741 0.9665 0.8782
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 23 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 23 4 0 4 0.174
2011-12 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 26 2 3 5 0.192
2010-11 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 15 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#27241
Forward overall
#861
Forward born in 1985
#933
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cade DeStefani
Salve Regina · 2021-22
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Remenda
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dennis Zak
UMass Boston · 2006-07
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.