| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-02 | Moose Jaw Warriors | WHL | 24 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.125 | 0.0608 | 0.0674 | 0.3051 | 0.3381 |
| 2002-03 | Moose Jaw Warriors | WHL | 49 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 0.286 | 0.1389 | 0.1469 | 0.6973 | 0.7375 |
| 2003-04 | — | WHL | 57 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 0.351 | 0.1706 | 0.1722 | 0.8565 | 0.8643 |
| 2004-05 | Red Deer Rebels | WHL | 55 | 10 | 19 | 29 | 0.527 | 0.2564 | 0.2450 | 1.2870 | 1.2298 |
| 2005-06 | Seattle Thunderbirds | WHL | 66 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 0.394 | 0.1915 | 0.1740 | 0.9614 | 0.8736 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | Hamline | D3 | — | SR | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2012-13 | Hamline | D3 | — | JR | 23 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.174 |
| 2011-12 | Hamline | D3 | — | SO | 26 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.192 |
| 2010-11 | Hamline | D3 | — | FR | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.