← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chuck Owens

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
Air Force
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 23 1 7 8 0.348 0.0440 0.0440 0.0845 0.0845
2022-23 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 30 11 16 27 0.900 0.1139 0.1139 0.2186 0.2186
2023-24 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 31 15 22 37 1.194 0.1511 0.1511 0.2899 0.2899
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22153
Forward overall
#1067
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Air Force Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.21
actual FR PPG at Air Force
SJHL 2021-22
0.29
actual FR PPG at Air Force
NAHL 2019-20
0.14
actual FR PPG at Air Force
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Air Force

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2009-10
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.