IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Roost Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-10-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Premier 39 7 16 23 0.590 0.0771 0.0850 0.2001 0.2207
2018-19 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Premier 42 12 19 31 0.738 0.0965 0.1013 0.2505 0.2630
2019-20 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Premier 42 10 28 38 0.905 0.1183 0.1183 0.3071 0.3071
2020-21 Florida Eels USPHL-Premier 43 24 31 55 1.279 0.1673 0.1673 0.4341 0.4341
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC — 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
90%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12697
Forward overall
#540
Forward born in 2000
#658
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Pitoscia
Adrian · 2018-19
0.964 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremiah Snyder
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Murray
Daniel Webster · 2011-12
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.