Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | White Bear Lake High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 19 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.053 | 0.0079 | 0.0079 |
| 2021-22 | White Bear Lake High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.148 | 0.0224 | 0.0224 |
| 2022-23 | White Bear Lake High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.385 | 0.0581 | 0.0593 |
| 2023-24 | White Bear Lake High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 0.630 | 0.0951 | 0.0931 |
| 2024-25 | White Bear Lake High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.385 | 0.0581 | 0.0547 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Hamline | MIAC | FR | 28 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0.286 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Niska | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Kate Glover | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG | 0.167 | Harvard |
| Abby Ecker | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG | 0.000 | Bemidji State |
| Ellie Larson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG | 0.143 | RIT |
| Jordan Jackson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG | 0.130 | Minnesota State |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gabriela Gross | 2023-24 · 0.44 PPG | 0.294 | Trinity | NESCAC |
| Mallory Farrell | 2023-24 · 0.65 PPG | 0.200 | Colby | NESCAC |
| Mikayla Murray | 2023-24 · 0.45 PPG | 0.316 | Trinity | NESCAC |
| Paige Friedman | 2024-25 · 0.35 PPG | — | St. Olaf | MIAC |
| Natasha Ludwig | 2024-25 · 0.71 PPG | 0.174 | Beloit | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.