IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lila Lanctot Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-01-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 1 11 12 0.480 0.0725 0.0725 — —
2019-20 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 2 18 20 0.800 0.1208 0.1208 — —
2020-21 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 2 8 10 0.455 0.0686 0.0686 — —
2021-22 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 30 23 15 38 1.267 0.1913 0.1913 — —
2022-23 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 30 14 11 25 0.833 0.1258 0.1134 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 24 1 1 2 0.083
2024-25 Concordia D3 — — 17 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Concordia D3 — — 24 2 3 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2023-24 · Concordia
+52.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1732
Defenseman overall
#248
Defenseman born in 2005
#1291
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Taylor Flaherty
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ North Dakota
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Emma Turbyville
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Allison Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Briana Jorde
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Flaherty
North Dakota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Turbyville
St. Cloud State ·
0.040 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Allison Roethke
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.