IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Sackrison Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-11-12 Country: USA
2006 · Round 4, Pick #124  ·  St. Louis Blues St. Louis Blues
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Tri-City Storm USHL 59 12 15 27 0.458 0.2699 0.2657 1.3744 1.3528
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Minnesota State D1 CCHA SR 37 5 14 19 0.513
2009-10 Minnesota State D1 CCHA JR 21 3 2 5 0.238
2008-09 Minnesota State D1 CCHA SO 31 3 5 8 0.258
2007-08 Minnesota State D1 CCHA FR 36 6 14 20 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2007-08 · Minnesota State
+144.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17890
Forward overall
#606
Forward born in 1987
#1743
in USHL

D1 Comparables

A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Cuthrell
Nichols · 2012-13
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Marra
SUNY Geneseo · 2013-14
1.161 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Cole
Trinity · 2011-12
1.846 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.