IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Frank Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-05-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.2432 0.2668 1.2251 1.3438
2010-11 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 31 0 1 1 0.032 0.0157 0.0165 0.0791 0.0830
2011-12 Seattle Thunderbirds WHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Calgary Mustangs AJHL 57 6 19 25 0.439 0.1455 0.1415 0.4065 0.3954
2013-14 Calgary Mustangs AJHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1659 0.1528 0.4634 0.4267
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Lawrence D3 ECAC SR 27 1 18 19 0.704
2016-17 Lawrence D3 ECAC JR 25 2 9 11 0.440
2015-16 Lawrence D3 ECAC SO 26 3 5 8 0.308
2014-15 Lawrence D3 ECAC FR 27 2 4 6 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2014-15 · Lawrence
+58.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13777
Defenseman overall
#1529
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amit Grumet-Morris
Becker · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Alarie
SUNY Morrisville · 2005-06
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Day
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.