← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sydney Hunst Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Owatonna High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 7 7 14 0.560 0.0846 0.0846
2017-18 Owatonna High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 11 6 17 0.739 0.1116 0.1116
2018-19 Owatonna High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 6 8 14 0.583 0.0881 0.0881
2019-20 Owatonna High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 11 21 32 1.333 0.2013 0.2013
2020-21 Owatonna High (W) USHS-MN-W 20 9 19 28 1.400 0.2114 0.2114
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Saint Benedict D3 MIAC SR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Saint Benedict D3 MIAC JR 21 0 5 5 0.238
2022-23 Saint Benedict D3 MIAC SO 21 1 2 3 0.143
2021-22 Saint Benedict D3 MIAC FR 9 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4187
Forward overall
#166
Forward born in 2003
#691
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.82 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.34 PPG
→ Vermont (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Cornell (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2014-15
0.321 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2012-13
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.