IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ashley Effertz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 25 8 9 17 0.680 0.1027 0.1027 — —
2012-13 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 19 9 5 14 0.737 0.1113 0.1113 — —
2013-14 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 25 8 13 21 0.840 0.1268 0.1268 — —
2014-15 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 24 9 10 19 0.792 0.1195 0.1195 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC SR 29 4 13 17 0.586
2017-18 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC JR 4 1 2 3 0.750
2016-17 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC SO 24 2 4 6 0.250
2015-16 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC FR 22 2 8 10 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2015-16 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+293.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2058
Defenseman overall
#1552
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Ebba Strandberg
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Maine (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Allison Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Flaherty
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ North Dakota
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mollie Koch
Saint Mary's · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jada Ward
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2015-16
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sydney Hunst
Saint Benedict · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.