IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bailey Wendt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Coon Rapids High USHS-W 25 0 3 3 0.120 0.0361 0.0361 — —
2013-14 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 4 2 6 0.250 0.0377 0.0377 — —
2014-15 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 9 8 17 0.708 0.1070 0.1070 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SR 26 6 8 14 0.538
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 26 6 8 14 0.538
2017-18 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 25 13 3 16 0.640
2016-17 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 19 5 2 7 0.368
2015-16 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 15 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#10061
Forward overall

D1 Comparables

Sierra Semmel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kippin Keller
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Suvi Ollikainen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Janna Haeg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kendall Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Colgate
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Courtney Moriarty
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sadie Long
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Maddy Wallraff
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2014-15
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.