IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maddy Wallraff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Spring Lake Park (women) USHS-MN-W 16 1 0 1 0.062 0.0094 0.0094 — —
2011-12 Spring Lake Park (women) USHS-MN-W 25 4 7 11 0.440 0.0664 0.0664 — —
2012-13 Spring Lake Park (women) USHS-MN-W 25 2 7 9 0.360 0.0544 0.0544 — —
2013-14 Spring Lake Park (women) USHS-MN-W 25 11 6 17 0.680 0.1027 0.1027 — —
2014-15 Spring Lake Park (women) USHS-MN-W 25 16 16 32 1.280 0.1933 0.1933 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SR 24 1 4 5 0.208
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 24 1 4 5 0.208
2017-18 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 22 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 24 3 2 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2015-16 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+55.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5947
Forward overall
#1310
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jackie Pieper
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.32 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Molly Strabley
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Princeton (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sena Hanson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Savannah Quandt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hailey Adair
Wisconsin-Superior · 2010-11
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Julia Pias
Saint Benedict · 2016-17
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michaela Igo
Connecticut College · 2011-12
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.