IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lauren Klein Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 0 1 1 0.040 0.0060 0.0060 — —
2014-15 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 2 6 8 0.320 0.0483 0.0483 — —
2015-16 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 2 9 11 0.440 0.0664 0.0664 — —
2016-17 Northwood School USHS-W 55 33 26 59 1.073 0.3226 0.3226 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Colby D3 NESCAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Colby D3 NESCAC — 24 7 7 14 0.583
2018-19 Colby D3 NESCAC — 20 7 6 13 0.650
2017-18 Boston University D1 HEA-W — 19 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Colby D3 NESCAC — 16 2 1 3 0.188

NCAAe Rankings

#4648
Forward overall
#177
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Taylor Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sylvia Marolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.32 No data
NCAAe PPG
Demi Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Williamson
Minnesota ·
0.395 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sylvia Marolt
Bemidji State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.