IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Courtney Kelly Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-10-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Shamrocks JWHL-U19 28 0 3 3 0.107 0.0402 0.0402 — —
2016-17 Boston Shamrocks JWHL-U19 23 2 2 4 0.174 0.0653 0.0653 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA SR 27 0 2 2 0.074
2021-22 St. Michael's College D3 NEWHA — 24 0 2 2 0.083
2020-21 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA SO 29 2 4 6 0.207
2019-20 St. Michael's College D3 NEWHA JR 29 2 4 6 0.207
2018-19 St. Michael's College D3 NEWHA FR 25 3 9 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2018-19 · St. Michael's College
+819.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5269
Defenseman overall
#349
Defenseman born in 1997
#432
in JWHL-U19

D1 Comparables

Lauren Niska
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kate Glover
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Harvard (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Paige Michel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ UConn (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Abby Ecker
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.07 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ellie Larson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ RIT (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Macy Peterson
Post · 2022-23
0.194 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kayson Ruegge
Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Niomi Phillips
Curry · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.