IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mollie Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Conestoga High USHS-W 15 20 12 32 2.133 0.6415 0.6415 — —
2013-14 Conestoga High USHS-W 15 13 13 26 1.733 0.5212 0.5212 — —
2014-15 Conestoga High USHS-W 9 6 8 14 1.556 0.4678 0.4678 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Neumann D3 UCHC GR 23 1 8 9 0.391
2018-19 Neumann D3 UCHC SR 26 2 6 8 0.308
2017-18 Neumann D3 UCHC JR 25 1 7 8 0.320
2016-17 Neumann D3 UCHC SO 25 2 3 5 0.200
2015-16 Neumann D3 UCHC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#59
Defenseman overall
#35
Defenseman born in 1997
#144
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Briana Mastel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Anna Wright
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Marchin
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Yale (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Kelly
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Meghan Turner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.17 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adriana Urban
Plattsburgh · 2021-22
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shelby Johnson
Salve Regina · 2010-11
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Erica Schramel
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2014-15
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.