← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emma Berthiaume Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Hutchinson High USHS-MN-W 24 2 6 8 0.333 0.0503 0.0503
2014-15 Hutchinson High USHS-MN-W 25 9 10 19 0.760 0.1148 0.1148
2015-16 Hutchinson High USHS-MN-W 25 11 17 28 1.120 0.1691 0.1691
2016-17 Hutchinson High USHS-MN-W 24 9 12 21 0.875 0.1321 0.1321
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC 25 1 2 3 0.120
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC 26 2 15 17 0.654
2021-22 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC 26 2 15 17 0.654
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC 10 1 2 3 0.300
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 28 3 5 8 0.286
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 27 1 4 5 0.185
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 27 2 5 7 0.259
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+106.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5622
Forward overall
#1180
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2018-19
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2011-12
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.