IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lauryn Folker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Park County Ice Cats USHS-W 14 12 9 21 1.500 0.4511 0.4511 — —
2015-16 Park County Ice Cats USHS-W 14 12 9 21 1.500 0.4511 0.4511 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SO 23 3 3 6 0.261
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 23 3 3 6 0.261
2018-19 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC FR 25 1 3 4 0.160
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 25 1 3 4 0.160
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2018-19 · Saint Mary's
-58.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#951
Forward overall
#56
Forward born in 1999
#318
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Lauren Abbenante
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sara Ugalde
Middlebury · 2008-09
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jerica Friese
Concordia · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Courtney Moser
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2016-17
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.