Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2015-16 | Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.120 | 0.0181 | 0.0181 |
| 2016-17 | Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0.280 | 0.0423 | 0.0423 |
| 2017-18 | Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 6 | 14 | 20 | 0.800 | 0.1208 | 0.1208 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC | SO | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.100 |
| 2018-19 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC | FR | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi Witt | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG | 0.000 | New Hampshire |
| Allison Roethke | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG | 0.000 | Quinnipiac |
| Emma Turbyville | NE-Prep-Girls · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG | 0.040 | St. Cloud State |
| Kenzie Prater | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG | 0.432 | Quinnipiac |
| Taylor Flaherty | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG | 0.000 | North Dakota |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dani Weiland | 2024-25 · 0.96 PPG | 0.300 | Wisconsin-Stevens Point | WIAC |
| Mollie Koch | 2024-25 · 0.72 PPG | — | Saint Mary's | MIAC |
| Harper Poehling | 2024-25 · 1.13 PPG | 0.263 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Charlotte Bellmont | 2024-25 · 0.69 PPG | — | Saint Benedict | MIAC |
| Kate Elbrecht | 2025-26 · 0.75 PPG | — | RPI | ECAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.