← New Search ↗ Social Card

Allison McElwee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Laramie Outlaws USHS-W 16 12 6 18 1.125 0.3383 0.3383
2013-14 Laramie Outlaws USHS-W 16 14 2 16 1.000 0.3007 0.3007
2014-15 Laramie Outlaws USHS-W 15 18 10 28 1.867 0.5613 0.5613
2015-16 Laramie Outlaws USHS-W 14 13 8 21 1.500 0.4511 0.4511
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA 19 1 0 1 0.053
2020-21 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SR 19 1 0 1 0.053
2019-20 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA 22 2 4 6 0.273
2019-20 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA JR 22 2 4 6 0.273
2018-19 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA 22 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SO 22 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 27 1 1 2 0.074
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2017-18 · Concordia (WI)
-82.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#947
Forward overall
#316
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Middlebury · 2008-09
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2016-17
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.