IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brent Gwidt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-02-20 Country: USA
2006 · Round 5, Pick #157  ·  Washington Capitals Washington Capitals
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Indiana Ice USHL 55 8 5 13 0.236 0.1395 0.1392 0.7100 0.7086
2007-08 Indiana Ice USHL 56 8 14 22 0.393 0.2318 0.2195 1.1800 1.1172
2008-09 Indiana Ice USHL 60 11 17 28 0.467 0.2753 0.2483 1.4017 1.2644
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Nebraska Omaha D1 CCHA-orig SR 39 8 5 13 0.333
2011-12 Nebraska Omaha D1 CCHA-orig JR 38 6 9 15 0.395
2010-11 Nebraska Omaha D1 CCHA-orig SO 37 3 3 6 0.162
2009-10 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 30 2 3 5 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2009-10 · Nebraska Omaha
-17.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22654
Forward overall
#795
Forward born in 1988
#2214
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Hanson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonny Ruiz
Johnson & Wales · 2014-15
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Stark
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.