IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maggie Cragg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Champlin Park High (Women) USHS-W 25 7 4 11 0.440 0.1323 0.1323 — —
2011-12 Champlin Park High (Women) USHS-W 25 4 15 19 0.760 0.2285 0.2285 — —
2012-13 Champlin Park High (Women) USHS-W 25 5 10 15 0.600 0.1804 0.1804 — —
2013-14 Champlin Park High (Women) USHS-W 24 6 11 17 0.708 0.2130 0.2130 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SR 27 2 8 10 0.370
2016-17 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 20 0 2 2 0.100
2015-16 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 25 1 6 7 0.280
2014-15 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 27 3 8 11 0.407
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2014-15 · Wisconsin-Superior
+115.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#923
Defenseman overall
#1399
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mollie Koch
Saint Mary's · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kari Miller
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jamie Bird
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.