← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Larson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1980-11-08 Country: USA
2007 · Round 6, Pick #185  ·  Washington Capitals Washington Capitals
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 56 4 12 16 0.286 0.1685 0.1605 0.8581 0.8175
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Denver D1 NCHC SR 34 1 2 3 0.088
2003-04 Denver D1 NCHC JR 30 0 1 1 0.033
2002-03 Denver D1 NCHC SO 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#8520
Defenseman overall
#543
Defenseman born in 1980
#2987
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2009-10
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2024-25
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2013-14
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.