IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emersynn McGillis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-03-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Nepean Wildcats OWHL-U22 28 0 10 10 0.357 0.1251 0.1251 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA SR 34 1 0 1 0.029
2025-26 St. Michael's College D3 — SR 34 1 0 1 0.029
2024-25 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA JR 35 1 0 1 0.029
2024-25 St. Michael's College D3 — JR 31 1 0 1 0.032
2023-24 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA SO 36 1 0 1 0.028
2023-24 St. Michael's College D3 — SO 24 1 0 1 0.042
2022-23 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA FR 27 0 3 3 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2022-23 · St. Michael's College
-5.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2117
Defenseman overall
#309
Defenseman born in 2004
#436
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Allison Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ebba Strandberg
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Maine (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Emma Turbyville
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Flaherty
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ North Dakota
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kenzie Prater
Quinnipiac ·
0.432 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Allison Roethke
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ebba Strandberg
Maine ·
0.333 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.