IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ellie Gauvin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Weyburn Gold Wings SFMAAAHL-W 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Notre Dame Hounds SFMAAAHL-W 30 1 4 5 0.167 0.0390 0.0390 — —
2020-21 Notre Dame Hounds SFMAAAHL-W 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.1169 0.1169 — —
2021-22 Notre Dame Hounds SFMAAAHL-W 29 8 8 16 0.552 0.1290 0.1290 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Brown D1 ECAC-W — 12 0 2 2 0.167
2023-24 Brown D1 ECAC-W — 25 2 4 6 0.240
2022-23 Brown D1 ECAC-W — 27 2 2 4 0.148
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2022-23 · Brown
+21.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3149
Defenseman overall
#414
Defenseman born in 2004
#102
in SFMAAAHL-W

D1 Comparables

Allison Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ebba Strandberg
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Maine (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Flaherty
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ North Dakota
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gracyn Knowles
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.548 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brynn Puppe
Williams · 2015-16
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mara Teschendorf
Wisconsin-Superior · 2011-12
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.