IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braedyn Cyr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-06-24 Country: Canada
Albertus Magnus
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Timmins Rock NOJHL 49 6 23 29 0.592 0.0988 0.0965 0.2464 0.2407
2025-26 Timmins Rock NOJHL 51 6 38 44 0.863 0.1441 0.1334 0.3591 0.3325
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8305
Defenseman overall
#1897
Defenseman born in 2005
#400
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Albertus Magnus Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Paden Hicks
0.35
actual FR PPG at Albertus Magnus
Stephen Kyrkostas
0.38
actual FR PPG at Albertus Magnus
Jérémy Tremblay
0.33
actual FR PPG at Albertus Magnus
Maxim Tsegelnik
0.38
actual FR PPG at Albertus Magnus

D2/3 Comparables

Reid Brown
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan McCauley
Bethel · 2004-05
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Munroe
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.