← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dru Krebs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-02-16 Country: Canada
2021 · Round 6, Pick #176  ·  Washington Capitals Washington Capitals
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 55 3 10 13 0.236 0.1150 0.1150 0.5775 0.5775
2020-21 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 23 0 11 11 0.478 0.2327 0.2327 1.1683 1.1683
2021-22 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 66 4 15 19 0.288 0.1401 0.1379 0.7033 0.6920
2022-23 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 67 8 33 41 0.612 0.2977 0.2790 1.4947 1.4010
2023-24 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 68 6 23 29 0.426 0.2075 0.1843 1.0418 0.9252
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5854
Defenseman overall
#1431
Defenseman born in 2003
#938
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.