IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Leitner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-11-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Ohio Blue Jackets USHL 57 12 23 35 0.614 0.3622 0.3931 1.8441 2.0012
2008-09 Fargo Force USHL 56 14 43 57 1.018 0.6005 0.6248 3.0572 3.1809
2009-10 Fargo Force USHL 54 25 41 66 1.222 0.7210 0.7040 3.6708 3.5842
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Minnesota State D1 WCHA SR 40 9 32 41 1.025
2013-14 Minnesota State D1 WCHA JR 39 12 33 45 1.154
2012-13 Minnesota State D1 CCHA SO 41 17 30 47 1.146
2011-12 Minnesota State D1 CCHA FR 38 11 18 29 0.763
2010-11 Minnesota D1 WCHA-orig — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#3710
Forward overall
#172
Forward born in 1990
#111
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Zach Stepan
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Peter Quenneville
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.80 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Toninato
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.64 Average
NCAAe PPG
Frank Vatrano
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ UMass
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dennis Kravchenko
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.11 PPG
→ UMass (0.92 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.