| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Tri-City Americans | WHL | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.500 | 0.2432 | 0.2432 | 1.2251 | 1.2251 |
| 2020-21 | Tri-City Americans | WHL | 18 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.500 | 0.2432 | 0.2432 | 1.2251 | 1.2251 |
| 2021-22 | Tri-City Americans | WHL | 57 | 17 | 16 | 33 | 0.579 | 0.2816 | 0.2910 | 1.4185 | 1.4660 |
| 2022-23 | Tri-City Americans | WHL | 58 | 20 | 35 | 55 | 0.948 | 0.4613 | 0.4552 | 2.3236 | 2.2931 |
| 2023-24 | Tri-City Americans | WHL | 68 | 31 | 39 | 70 | 1.029 | 0.5008 | 0.4696 | 2.5223 | 2.3649 |
| 2024-25 | Tri-City Americans | WHL | 62 | 29 | 44 | 73 | 1.177 | 0.5728 | 0.5065 | 2.8850 | 2.5509 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Bowling Green | D1 | CCHA | FR | 32 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.219 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.