← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Sloan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Tri-City Americans WHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.2432 0.2432 1.2268 1.2268
2020-21 Tri-City Americans WHL 18 4 5 9 0.500 0.2432 0.2432 1.2268 1.2268
2021-22 Tri-City Americans WHL 57 17 16 33 0.579 0.2816 0.2910 1.4204 1.4680
2022-23 Tri-City Americans WHL 58 20 35 55 0.948 0.4613 0.4552 2.3268 2.2962
2023-24 Tri-City Americans WHL 68 31 39 70 1.029 0.5008 0.4696 2.5258 2.3682
2024-25 Tri-City Americans WHL 62 29 44 73 1.177 0.5728 0.5065 2.8890 2.5544
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowling Green D1 CCHA FR 32 2 5 7 0.219
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2025-26 · Bowling Green
-48.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5265
Forward overall
#137
Forward born in 2004
#119
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2016-17
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.