← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Babcock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Kelowna Rockets WHL 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0541 0.0541 0.2726 0.2726
2021-22 Kelowna Rockets WHL 57 3 20 23 0.404 0.1963 0.2048 0.9901 1.0330
2022-23 Kelowna Rockets WHL 59 1 9 10 0.170 0.0825 0.0822 0.4159 0.4145
2023-24 Kelowna Rockets WHL 64 4 13 17 0.266 0.1292 0.1224 0.6517 0.6175
2024-25 Regina Pats WHL 63 2 24 26 0.413 0.2008 0.1795 1.0126 0.9053
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 40 4 9 13 0.325
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2025-26 · Robert Morris
+119.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10685
Defenseman overall
#2281
Defenseman born in 2004
#1186
in WHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2016-17
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.