← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cayden Glover Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Medicine Hat Tigers WHL 15 0 1 1 0.067 0.0324 0.0324 0.1637 0.1637
2021-22 WHL 46 6 2 8 0.174 0.0846 0.0871 0.4267 0.4391
2022-23 Prince George Cougars WHL 51 7 5 12 0.235 0.1145 0.1125 0.5774 0.5672
2023-24 Dauphin Kings MJHL 50 20 28 48 0.960 0.1848 0.1778
2024-25 Dauphin Kings MJHL 38 33 19 52 1.368 0.2634 0.2390 0.8629 0.7829
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 27 7 7 14 0.518
2024-25 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 27 7 7 14 0.518
2023-24 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 27 7 7 14 0.518
2022-23 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 27 7 7 14 0.518
2021-22 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 27 7 7 14 0.518
2020-21 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 27 7 7 14 0.518

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18239
Forward overall
#921
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chatham · 2024-25
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.