← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rylan Gould Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-05 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Swift Current Broncos WHL 66 4 9 13 0.197 0.0958 0.1061 0.4827 0.5345
2022-23 Swift Current Broncos WHL 64 1 3 4 0.062 0.0304 0.0322 0.1531 0.1624
2023-24 Swift Current Broncos WHL 68 23 45 68 1.000 0.4865 0.4920 2.4503 2.4781
2024-25 Swift Current Broncos WHL 60 29 37 66 1.100 0.5352 0.5127 2.6953 2.5820
2025-26 Everett Silvertips WHL 53 21 29 50 0.943 0.4590 0.4185 2.3116 2.1074
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA FR 6 1 0 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.47
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2025-26 · Michigan Tech
-64.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5717
Forward overall
#181
Forward born in 2005
#205
in WHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2013-14
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.