IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Beau Courtney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Everett Silvertips WHL 54 4 4 8 0.148 0.0721 0.0742 0.3629 0.3735
2022-23 Everett Silvertips WHL 47 8 10 18 0.383 0.1863 0.1830 0.9385 0.9220
2023-24 Everett Silvertips WHL 66 17 15 32 0.485 0.2359 0.2201 1.1879 1.1086
2024-25 Kamloops Blazers WHL 62 10 6 16 0.258 0.1256 0.1105 0.6324 0.5564
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA FR 7 1 0 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2025-26 · Alaska Fairbanks
+8.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32261
Forward overall
#1935
Forward born in 2004
#1076
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Landon Adams
Beloit · 2024-25
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Newpower
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2022-23
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Cass
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.