IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grayson Burzynski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-06-04 Country: Canada
RPI
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Swift Current Broncos WHL 54 3 3 6 0.111 0.0541 0.0594 0.2726 0.2995
2022-23 Swift Current Broncos WHL 59 5 7 12 0.203 0.0990 0.1042 0.4991 0.5251
2023-24 Swift Current Broncos WHL 58 2 11 13 0.224 0.1090 0.1093 0.5499 0.5515
2024-25 Swift Current Broncos WHL 62 11 36 47 0.758 0.3688 0.3502 1.8601 1.7662
2025-26 Brandon Wheat Kings WHL 59 11 47 58 0.983 0.4783 0.4320 2.4122 2.1786
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2276
Defenseman overall
#535
Defenseman born in 2005
#429
in WHL

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Newell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Harvard (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Murphy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Cornell (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG

RPI Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Meirs Moore
BCHL 2014-15
0.18
actual FR PPG at RPI
Lauri Sertti
SM-Liiga-Jr 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at RPI
Lucas Lemieux
BCHL 2024-25
0.10
actual FR PPG at RPI

D2/3 Comparables

Jon Whitelaw
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Hepler
Lebanon Valley · 2015-16
1.280 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2011-12
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.