← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Guo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-02 Country: Canada
RPI
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Peterborough Petes OHL 52 1 3 4 0.077 0.0445 0.0484 0.1976 0.2148
2022-23 OHL 60 1 11 12 0.200 0.1157 0.1208 0.5139 0.5365
2023-24 Saginaw Spirit OHL 50 1 6 7 0.140 0.0810 0.0807 0.3597 0.3583
2024-25 Saginaw Spirit OHL 62 8 26 34 0.548 0.3172 0.2996 1.4091 1.3309
2025-26 Saginaw Spirit OHL 63 8 31 39 0.619 0.3581 0.3202 1.5905 1.4222
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3613
Defenseman overall
#940
Defenseman born in 2005
#749
in OHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

RPI Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2020-21
0.17
actual FR PPG at RPI
NAHL 2017-18
0.37
actual FR PPG at RPI
USPHL-Premier-Classic 2014-15
0.10
actual FR PPG at RPI
NAHL 2023-24
0.10
actual FR PPG at RPI

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2010-11
1.556 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.