← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Michael Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-02-05 Country: Canada
RPI
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Kamloops Blazers WHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0695 0.0752 0.3506 0.3795
2022-23 Kamloops Blazers WHL 60 3 9 12 0.200 0.0973 0.1008 0.4907 0.5083
2023-24 Kamloops Blazers WHL 52 2 19 21 0.404 0.1964 0.1938 0.9908 0.9775
2024-25 Kamloops Blazers WHL 45 2 12 14 0.311 0.1514 0.1413 0.7633 0.7123
2025-26 Kamloops Blazers WHL 67 3 30 33 0.492 0.2396 0.2125 1.2084 1.0717
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6783
Defenseman overall
#1646
Defenseman born in 2005
#956
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

RPI Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2017-18
0.37
actual FR PPG at RPI
USHL 2020-21
0.17
actual FR PPG at RPI
USPHL-Premier-Classic 2014-15
0.10
actual FR PPG at RPI
NAHL 2015-16
0.07
actual FR PPG at RPI

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2013-14
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2014-15
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.