IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas Lemieux Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-09-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 54 5 14 19 0.352 0.1180 0.1289 0.3256 0.3556
2023-24 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 34 6 10 16 0.471 0.1578 0.1649 0.4355 0.4551
2024-25 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 53 13 28 41 0.774 0.2981 0.2972 1.1258 1.1223
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RPI D1 ECAC FR 20 1 1 2 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2025-26 · RPI
-56.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6439
Defenseman overall
#1568
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Ryan Murray
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nelson Armstrong
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean David
Canton · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Imala
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Aucoin
Southern Maine · 2023-24
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.