← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan MacKenzie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-09-02 Country: Canada
2026 · Round 3, Pick #69  ·  Toronto Maple Leafs Toronto Maple Leafs
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
North Dakota
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 50 1 11 12 0.240 0.1168 0.1302 0.5889 0.6563
2023-24 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 26 1 5 6 0.231 0.1123 0.1196 0.5663 0.6032
2024-25 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 54 5 27 32 0.593 0.2883 0.2917 1.4541 1.4712
2025-26 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 59 22 36 58 0.983 0.4783 0.4618 2.4122 2.3289
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2629
Defenseman overall
#509
Defenseman born in 2006
#500
in WHL

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

North Dakota Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2020-21
0.19
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
USHL 2014-15
0.47
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
USHL 2023-24
0.13
actual FR PPG at North Dakota
BCHL 2012-13
0.26
actual FR PPG at North Dakota

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2016-17
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2014-15
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.