← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Strathmann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-02-27 Country: USA
2023 NHL Draft Round 4, Pick #98  ·  Columbus Blue Jackets Columbus Blue Jackets
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 USHL 61 5 18 23 0.377 0.2317 0.2534 1.1107 1.2145
2022-23 USHL 56 3 35 38 0.679 0.4171 0.4344 1.9993 2.0822
2023-24 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 48 7 32 39 0.812 0.4994 0.4953 2.3938 2.3742
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 North Dakota D1 NCHC SO 38 1 5 6 0.158
2024-25 North Dakota D1 NCHC 30 2 2 4 0.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.44
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2024-25 · North Dakota
-70.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

82%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1648
Defenseman overall
#331
Defenseman born in 2005
#693
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Hamline (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Denver (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Cornell
0.43 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.