← New Search ↗ Social Card

Parker Alcos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-07-20 Country: Canada
2024 · Round 6, Pick #189  ·  Vancouver Canucks Vancouver Canucks
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 WHL 12 0 2 2 0.167 0.0811 0.0899 0.4090 0.4533
2023-24 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 67 1 14 15 0.224 0.1089 0.1153 0.5494 0.5819
2024-25 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 57 1 12 13 0.228 0.1110 0.1116 0.5597 0.5629
2025-26 Kelowna Rockets WHL 63 5 25 30 0.476 0.2317 0.2223 1.1685 1.1211
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9363
Defenseman overall
#1894
Defenseman born in 2006
#1119
in WHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

OJHL 2017-18
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
USHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NAHL 2014-15
0.60
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
BCHL 2022-23
0.11
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2009-10
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2022-23
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.