← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Anastasio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-09 Country: USA
Quinnipiac
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep 25 3 3 6 0.240 0.0475 0.0475 0.1093 0.1093
2022-23 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep 25 1 9 10 0.400 0.0792 0.0792 0.1822 0.1822
2023-24 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep 23 4 12 16 0.696 0.1378 0.1378 0.3170 0.3170
2024-25 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 53 8 10 18 0.340 0.1308 0.1273 0.4942 0.4809
2025-26 Tri-City Storm USHL 41 0 7 7 0.171 0.1007 0.0904 0.5127 0.4605
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12629
Defenseman overall
#2535
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Quinnipiac Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
NE-Prep 2020-21
0.09
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
QMJHL 2025-26
0.17
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac
USports-M 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Quinnipiac

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2014-15
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2021-22
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.